#Crystal diskmark mac equavalent 1080p#
#Crystal diskmark mac equavalent install#
#Crystal diskmark mac equavalent pro#
#Crystal diskmark mac equavalent software#

Now go ahead and download the install package. From the download list, select the latest Desktop Video release (in the screen capture above, it’s 11.6). head over to the Blackmagic support page for capture and playback devices here.Ģ. Here are the steps you need to install it.ġ.

#Crystal diskmark mac equavalent software#

It's so frustrating when reviews lack the basic information needed to make them meaningful.Luckily, Blackmagic’s Disk Speed Test is part of a bigger software suite called Desktop Video, and that package is both free and PC compatible. *With this CPU-GPU combo, 64 GB RAM, 2 TB HD, and a 4K display, it's $7,050, which is $2,750 more than an M1 Max with the same RAM and TB size ($4,300).Īnd it's the exact same problem with the Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 and the Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio.

Without knowing which configuration of ZBook he's using (the only spec we're given is that it has 64 GB RAM), all his comparisons relative to the ZBook tell us nothing. Specifically, it can range from a low-end Core i5-11500H (6 cores) with Intel UHD integrated graphics, to an ultra-high-end* Xeon W-11955M (8 cores) with NVIDIA RTX A5000 GPU (16 GB DDR). That's a highly customizable workstation. Take, for instance, the HP ZBook Fury 17 G8.

tell us anything, because we have no idea what he's comparing the Macs against. Second, more generally, none of his benchmarks of the Macs vs. First, as mentioned by the commenters above, his gaming benchmark used a game that can't run natively on the Mac ( and he did this without informing the reader). Once the native versions come along we will see very different results. The bottom line is that these gaming tests prove nothing about the capabilities of the GPU for gaming. The iPhone/iPad native versions will run on the M1 but developers have not allowed it yet, probably because the interface is designed for touch. The problem is that the Mac version in the AppStore is x86 but the iPad/iPhone version is native M1 ARM. There are at this point few native games for the M1 on sale because many developers are still transitioning from x86 Mac to M1 Mac.īut one thing is different now that was not in the Mac market before, the plethora of Native iOS games for iPhone and iPad that already run native on the M1, like Civilization IV. I’ve seen articles like this repeated several times and people unfamiliar with Macs and the often poor x86 ports are simply coming to the wrong conclusions. Without telling his readers this, many will conclude that the M1 not good for gaming with native software instead of in emulation. The point is that these tests were run using Mac x86 games being emulated in Rosetta, something the author fails to mention. Rgd1101 said:Do you have any suggestion for native games that the author can use?

#Crystal diskmark mac equavalent pro#

Like the MacBook Air M1 (14:41) and MacBook Pro M1 (16:32) before them, the new 2021 M1-powered MacBook Pros have exceptional all-day battery life. They also bested the Surface Laptop Studio’s best time of 12:03. The M1 Pro (14:08) and M1 Max (15:31) MacBooks lasted far longer than the ProArt StudioBook (6:16) and ZBook Fury (7:09). MacBook M1 Pro and M1 Max: Battery life benchmarksīattery life is jaw-dropping compared to the competition. As I've said before, the MacBook Pro M1 Max is an absolute beast - and a complete waste for gamers. Both the Surface Laptop Studio (66 fps) and ZBook Fury (83) also performed better. The new MacBooks cannot touch the whopping 92 fps achieved on the ProArt Studio Book 16 (1080p). These numbers are marginally better than the 37 and 38 fps reached on the M1 MacBook Air and M1 MacBook Pro, respectively. Sid Meier’s Civilization VI runs at 46 fps on the M1 Pro (at 1512x982p resolution) and 46 fps on the M1 Max (1728x1080). However, our tests reveal some surprising numbers. Gaming is one of the areas we expected the 2021 MacBook Pros to really shine. MacBook M1 Pro and M1 Max: Gaming benchmarks However, both new laptops surpass the MacBook Air M1 (653) and MacBook Pro M1 (649). We don’t have Photoshop numbers for the Surface Laptop Studio or Asus ProArt StudioBook 16.

However, their respective times - 4:54 for the M1 Pro and 4:44 for the M1 Max - are comparable with the ZBook Fury’s 4:56. On the PugetBench Photoshop test, the M1 Pro (806) and M1 Max (877) scored less than the ZBook Fury (1017). They also outshine the MacBook Air M1’s 9:15 and the MacBook Pro M1’s 7:44.įinally, we have the sole performance category where the new M1 Pro/Max laptops lose. Both the M1 Pro and M1 Max MacBooks also beat the Asus and HP laptops in this category, but not by so much.

#Crystal diskmark mac equavalent 1080p#

They convert a 4K film to 1080p at 4:51 and 4:48, respectively this is nearly half the 11:24 taken by the Surface Laptop Studio. The new laptops nab another win on our Handbrake video transcoding test.